These two papers were suggested by a reviewer of a paper of mine regarding opportunistic routing. They associated these papers with my results, which means I should have differentiated the results better, as it is pretty obvious to me they have little in common.
Anyhow, I have now read the papers:
AODV-BR: Backup Routing in Ad Hoc Networks, Sung-Ju Lee and Mario Gerla, in Proceedings of IEEE WCNC 2000.
On-Demand Multipath Distance Vector Routing in Ad Hoc Networks, Mahesh Marina, Samir Das, in Proceedings of IEEE ICNP, November 2001.
AODV-BR: Backup Routing in Ad Hoc Networks, Sung-Ju Lee and Mario Gerla, in Proceedings of IEEE WCNC 2000.
This paper introduces an extension of AODV which allows for graceful recovery when a link breaks. It uses the query-reply mechanism to build additional back-up routes at nodes adjacent to the route in the path.
Once a link on the route breaks, it can be temporarily recovered using the alternate path, while a route error is sent to the source and a new route discovery is triggered.
The idea is simple and practical, and works fine. It does bring improvement over AODV. The key difference with opportunistic routing is that the alternate is used after a broken link, and is not used otherwise. This means that if the route is reliable, but better links appear later on, these are ignored.
On-Demand Multipath Distance Vector Routing in Ad Hoc Networks, Mahesh Marina, Samir Das, in Proceedings of IEEE ICNP, November 2001.
This is similar to the previous paper, except that it computes link disjoint paths between source and destination. Same as above, the query-reply mechanism of the route discovery is used to set up the multiple link disjoint paths (as opposed to just associated nodes along the path as in the previous paper). In case of link failure, the traffic fails over to another path.
Again, it obviously outperforms AODV. Again, it does not make use of the promiscuous nature of the air interface to forward packets further.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment